Minehut vs Server.pro

A side-by-side comparison of Minehut and Server.pro for Minecraft servers, from the prices and features each host publishes. Updated November 2026.

Minehut — Visit
Server.pro 6.1 Visit

The short answer

Minehut is a good fit for free servers that players can find in a lobby. Server.pro is a good fit for technical users who want root access.

Key differences

  • Minehut has no per-GB price to compare (it’s mainly a free host); Server.pro costs $1.75 per GB.
  • Only Minehut has a free plan.
  • Server.pro offers a one-click modpack installer (not stated for Minehut).
  • Server.pro offers free backups (not stated for Minehut).
  • Server.pro offers root access; Minehut doesn’t.

Side by side

FeatureMinehutServer.pro
Our score Free host 6.1 / 10
Price per GB Free $1.75
Starting price $0 $7.00/mo
4 GB server — $7.00
8 GB server — $14.00
Free plan Yes No
Locations Not stated 9
Regions Not stated Not stated
Bedrock Yes + crossplay Yes
Modpacks Not stated Yes
Free backups Not stated Yes
DDoS protection Not stated Not stated
Root access No Yes
24/7 support Not stated Not stated
Refund window Not stated Not stated
Control panel Minehut dashboard Server.pro panel
Hardware Not stated Not stated

Highlighted cells are better on that line. Prices are estimated from each host’s price per GB; confirm exact plans on their sites.

Minehut

Good:

  • Free
  • Bedrock players can join (crossplay)
  • Players can discover your server in the lobby

Watch out for:

  • Only 1 GB on the free plan
  • Players join through Minehut’s lobby

Checked on Minehut’s site on 11 November 2026.

Server.pro

Good:

  • Root shell and SFTP on every server
  • Daily backups
  • Low price per GB

Watch out for:

  • Starts at 4 GB
  • More technical than managed hosts

Checked on Server.pro’s site on 11 November 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Is Minehut or Server.pro better for Minecraft?
Minehut is a good fit for free servers that players can find in a lobby. Server.pro is a good fit for technical users who want root access.

More comparisons